Kazakhstan vs Sudan: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Kazakhstan
- Sudan
How they compare
Sudan currently reports 71,388 t against 70,400 t in Kazakhstan, a difference of 988 t.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Kazakhstan ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 81st and Sudan ranks 80th of 185 countries.
Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 78,899 t | 103,965 t | 25,066 t | Sudan |
| 2020s | 74,300 t | 114,762 t | 40,462 t | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen, Kazakhstan or Sudan?
- Sudan, at 71,388 t against 70,400 t in Kazakhstan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen between Kazakhstan and Sudan?
- 988 t, with Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Kazakhstan and Sudan rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen?
- Kazakhstan ranks 81st and Sudan ranks 80th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).