Kuwait vs Sierra Leone: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Kuwait
- Sierra Leone
How they compare
Sierra Leone currently reports 2,478 t against 2,412 t in Kuwait, a difference of 66 t.
The two have swapped places 17 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Kuwait ahead.
Kuwait ranks 157th and Sierra Leone ranks 156th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Kuwait averaged higher in 4 and Sierra Leone in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kuwait | Sierra Leone | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 77.78 t | 174.44 t | 96.67 t | Sierra Leone |
| 1970s | 58 t | 767.9 t | 709.9 t | Sierra Leone |
| 1980s | 457.5 t | 781.8 t | 324.3 t | Sierra Leone |
| 1990s | 975 t | 653 t | 322 t | Kuwait |
| 2000s | 1,039 t | 773.9 t | 264.85 t | Kuwait |
| 2010s | 2,448 t | 1,404 t | 1,044 t | Kuwait |
| 2020s | 2,606 t | 2,478 t | 128.12 t | Kuwait |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen, Kuwait or Sierra Leone?
- Sierra Leone, at 2,478 t against 2,412 t in Kuwait as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen between Kuwait and Sierra Leone?
- 66 t, with Sierra Leone ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kuwait and Sierra Leone?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Kuwait and Sierra Leone rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen?
- Kuwait ranks 157th and Sierra Leone ranks 156th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).