Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Mexico: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
3.39 million t
in 2023
Mexico
1.43 million t
in 2023
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) rank
17th
Mexico rank
17th

Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen over time

  • Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
  • Mexico
01.0M2.0M3.0M196119922023

How they compare

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) currently reports 3.39 million t against 1.43 million t in Mexico, a difference of 1.96 million t.

That makes Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)'s figure about 2.4 times Mexico's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ahead.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 17th and Mexico ranks 17th of 32 groups.

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) Mexico Difference Ahead
1960s 645,393 t 224,727 t 420,666 t Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
1970s 1.86 million t 579,500 t 1.28 million t Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
1980s 2.91 million t 1.07 million t 1.83 million t Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
1990s 1.45 million t 1.10 million t 347,783 t Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2000s 1.29 million t 1.03 million t 263,986 t Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2010s 2.36 million t 1.26 million t 1.10 million t Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)
2020s 3.08 million t 1.33 million t 1.75 million t Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen, Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) or Mexico?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs), at 3.39 million t against 1.43 million t in Mexico as of 2023.
What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen between Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Mexico?
1.96 million t, with Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Mexico?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) and Mexico rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen?
Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) ranks 17th and Mexico ranks 17th of 32 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Mexico: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 15 August 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mineral-fertilizers-cropland-nitrogen/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/mexico/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mineral-fertilizers-cropland-nitrogen/land-locked-developing-countries-lldcs/mexico/">Land Locked Developing Countries (LLDCs) vs Mexico: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,500 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).