Latvia vs Portugal: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Latvia
- Portugal
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 72,277 t against 71,744 t in Portugal, a difference of 533 t.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Portugal ahead.
Latvia ranks 78th and Portugal ranks 79th of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 1 and Portugal in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Portugal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 28,474 t | 126,625 t | 98,151 t | Portugal |
| 2000s | 36,396 t | 93,101 t | 56,705 t | Portugal |
| 2010s | 65,554 t | 90,761 t | 25,207 t | Portugal |
| 2020s | 82,936 t | 72,058 t | 10,878 t | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen, Latvia or Portugal?
- Latvia, at 72,277 t against 71,744 t in Portugal as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen between Latvia and Portugal?
- 533 t, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Portugal?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Latvia and Portugal rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen?
- Latvia ranks 78th and Portugal ranks 79th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).