Luxembourg vs Trinidad and Tobago: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Luxembourg
- Trinidad and Tobago
How they compare
Trinidad and Tobago currently reports 3,764 t against 3,633 t in Luxembourg, a difference of 131 t.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
Luxembourg ranks 139th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 138th of 186 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Luxembourg averaged higher in 2 and Trinidad and Tobago in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Luxembourg | Trinidad and Tobago | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 5,451 t | 4,615 t | 835.36 t | Luxembourg |
| 2010s | 5,321 t | 5,411 t | 89.95 t | Trinidad and Tobago |
| 2020s | 4,141 t | 3,888 t | 252.95 t | Luxembourg |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen, Luxembourg or Trinidad and Tobago?
- Trinidad and Tobago, at 3,764 t against 3,633 t in Luxembourg as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen between Luxembourg and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 131 t, with Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Trinidad and Tobago?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Luxembourg and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen?
- Luxembourg ranks 139th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 138th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).