Malawi vs Serbia: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Malawi
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 209,210 t against 203,794 t in Malawi, a difference of 5,416 t.
Across all 18 years both countries report, Serbia has been ahead every year.
Malawi ranks 47th and Serbia ranks 46th of 185 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malawi | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 84,380 t | 200,523 t | 116,143 t | Serbia |
| 2010s | 84,889 t | 193,686 t | 108,797 t | Serbia |
| 2020s | 132,212 t | 209,023 t | 76,811 t | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen, Malawi or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 209,210 t against 203,794 t in Malawi as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen between Malawi and Serbia?
- 5,416 t, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Serbia?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Malawi and Serbia rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen?
- Malawi ranks 47th and Serbia ranks 46th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).