Malta vs South Sudan: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Malta
- South Sudan
How they compare
Malta currently reports 586 t against 458 t in South Sudan, a difference of 128 t.
That makes Malta's figure about 1.3 times South Sudan's.
Across all 12 years both countries report, Malta has been ahead every year.
Malta ranks 153rd and South Sudan ranks 156th of 186 countries.
Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malta | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 582.12 t | 47.25 t | 534.88 t | Malta |
| 2020s | 586 t | 254 t | 332 t | Malta |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen, Malta or South Sudan?
- Malta, at 586 t against 458 t in South Sudan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen between Malta and South Sudan?
- 128 t, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and South Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Malta and South Sudan rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen?
- Malta ranks 153rd and South Sudan ranks 156th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).