Micronesia (Federated States of) vs Poland: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Micronesia (Federated States of)
- Poland
How they compare
Poland currently reports 842,047 t against 5 t in Micronesia (Federated States of), a difference of 842,042 t.
Across all 33 years both countries report, Poland has been ahead every year.
Micronesia (Federated States of) ranks 18th and Poland ranks 20th of 18 regions.
Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Micronesia (Federated States of) | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 14 t | 652,565 t | 652,551 t | Poland |
| 2000s | 13.3 t | 779,272 t | 779,259 t | Poland |
| 2010s | 3.8 t | 870,372 t | 870,368 t | Poland |
| 2020s | 2 t | 798,702 t | 798,700 t | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen, Micronesia (Federated States of) or Poland?
- Poland, at 842,047 t against 5 t in Micronesia (Federated States of) as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen between Micronesia (Federated States of) and Poland?
- 842,042 t, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Micronesia (Federated States of) and Poland?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2023.
- How do Micronesia (Federated States of) and Poland rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen?
- Micronesia (Federated States of) ranks 18th and Poland ranks 20th of 18 regions.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).