Morocco vs Serbia, Republic of: Mineral fertilizers β Cropland nitrogen
Mineral fertilizers β Cropland nitrogen over time
- Morocco
- Serbia, Republic of
How they compare
Serbia, Republic of currently reports 209,210 t against 198,000 t in Morocco, a difference of 11,210 t.
That makes Serbia, Republic of's figure about 1.1 times Morocco's.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Morocco ahead.
Morocco ranks 48th and Serbia, Republic of ranks 46th of 185 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Morocco averaged higher in 1 and Serbia, Republic of in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Morocco | Serbia, Republic of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 219,844 t | 200,523 t | 19,321 t | Morocco |
| 2010s | 189,210 t | 193,686 t | 4,476 t | Serbia, Republic of |
| 2020s | 181,586 t | 209,023 t | 27,437 t | Serbia, Republic of |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers β cropland nitrogen, Morocco or Serbia, Republic of?
- Serbia, Republic of, at 209,210 t against 198,000 t in Morocco as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers β cropland nitrogen between Morocco and Serbia, Republic of?
- 11,210 t, with Serbia, Republic of ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Morocco and Serbia, Republic of?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Morocco and Serbia, Republic of rank globally for mineral fertilizers β cropland nitrogen?
- Morocco ranks 48th and Serbia, Republic of ranks 46th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers β Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).