Mozambique vs Tunisia: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Mozambique
- Tunisia
How they compare
Tunisia currently reports 57,142 t against 56,512 t in Mozambique, a difference of 630 t.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Tunisia has been ahead every year.
Mozambique ranks 89th and Tunisia ranks 88th of 186 countries.
Tunisia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mozambique | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 3,724 t | 6,629 t | 2,905 t | Tunisia |
| 1970s | 7,740 t | 20,882 t | 13,142 t | Tunisia |
| 1980s | 7,498 t | 41,016 t | 33,518 t | Tunisia |
| 1990s | 3,960 t | 51,333 t | 47,373 t | Tunisia |
| 2000s | 14,068 t | 67,370 t | 53,302 t | Tunisia |
| 2010s | 28,819 t | 79,752 t | 50,933 t | Tunisia |
| 2020s | 49,982 t | 73,087 t | 23,106 t | Tunisia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen, Mozambique or Tunisia?
- Tunisia, at 57,142 t against 56,512 t in Mozambique as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen between Mozambique and Tunisia?
- 630 t, with Tunisia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mozambique and Tunisia?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Mozambique and Tunisia rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen?
- Mozambique ranks 89th and Tunisia ranks 88th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).