Nigeria vs Yugoslav SFR: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Nigeria
- Yugoslav SFR
How they compare
Nigeria currently reports 336,502 t against 288,000 t in Yugoslav SFR, a difference of 48,502 t.
That makes Nigeria's figure about 1.2 times Yugoslav SFR's.
Across all 31 years both countries report, Yugoslav SFR has been ahead every year.
Nigeria ranks 35th and Yugoslav SFR ranks 36th of 186 countries.
Yugoslav SFR has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nigeria | Yugoslav SFR | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 2,166 t | 187,416 t | 185,249 t | Yugoslav SFR |
| 1970s | 25,495 t | 366,513 t | 341,017 t | Yugoslav SFR |
| 1980s | 122,285 t | 494,271 t | 371,986 t | Yugoslav SFR |
| 1990s | 211,000 t | 364,850 t | 153,850 t | Yugoslav SFR |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen, Nigeria or Yugoslav SFR?
- Nigeria, at 336,502 t against 288,000 t in Yugoslav SFR as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen between Nigeria and Yugoslav SFR?
- 48,502 t, with Nigeria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nigeria and Yugoslav SFR?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1991.
- How do Nigeria and Yugoslav SFR rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen?
- Nigeria ranks 35th and Yugoslav SFR ranks 36th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).