Philippines vs Spain: Mineral fertilizers β Cropland nitrogen
Mineral fertilizers β Cropland nitrogen over time
- Philippines
- Spain
How they compare
Spain currently reports 792,456 t against 678,971 t in Philippines, a difference of 113,485 t.
That makes Spain's figure about 1.2 times Philippines's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Spain has been ahead every year.
Philippines ranks 27th and Spain ranks 25th of 201 countries.
Spain has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Philippines | Spain | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 60,443 t | 439,232 t | 378,789 t | Spain |
| 1970s | 158,999 t | 757,680 t | 598,681 t | Spain |
| 1980s | 270,816 t | 967,255 t | 696,439 t | Spain |
| 1990s | 418,672 t | 1.03 million t | 615,140 t | Spain |
| 2000s | 494,300 t | 990,690 t | 496,390 t | Spain |
| 2010s | 591,537 t | 992,083 t | 400,546 t | Spain |
| 2020s | 687,752 t | 875,847 t | 188,095 t | Spain |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers β cropland nitrogen, Philippines or Spain?
- Spain, at 792,456 t against 678,971 t in Philippines as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers β cropland nitrogen between Philippines and Spain?
- 113,485 t, with Spain ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Philippines and Spain?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Philippines and Spain rank globally for mineral fertilizers β cropland nitrogen?
- Philippines ranks 27th and Spain ranks 25th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers β Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).