Serbia vs Zambia: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Serbia
- Zambia
How they compare
Zambia currently reports 217,793 t against 209,210 t in Serbia, a difference of 8,583 t.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Serbia ahead.
Serbia ranks 46th and Zambia ranks 44th of 186 countries.
Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Serbia | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 200,523 t | 39,655 t | 160,868 t | Serbia |
| 2010s | 193,686 t | 134,480 t | 59,206 t | Serbia |
| 2020s | 209,023 t | 185,234 t | 23,790 t | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen, Serbia or Zambia?
- Zambia, at 217,793 t against 209,210 t in Serbia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen between Serbia and Zambia?
- 8,583 t, with Zambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Serbia and Zambia?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Serbia and Zambia rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen?
- Serbia ranks 46th and Zambia ranks 44th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).