Sudan (former) vs Tajikistan: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Sudan (former)
- Tajikistan
How they compare
Sudan (former) currently reports 87,550 t against 74,566 t in Tajikistan, a difference of 12,984 t.
That makes Sudan (former)'s figure about 1.2 times Tajikistan's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 20 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Tajikistan ahead.
Sudan (former) ranks 74th and Tajikistan ranks 77th of 186 countries.
Sudan (former) has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sudan (former) | Tajikistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 44,700 t | 37,775 t | 6,925 t | Sudan (former) |
| 2000s | 57,163 t | 12,902 t | 44,262 t | Sudan (former) |
| 2010s | 108,480 t | 8,059 t | 100,421 t | Sudan (former) |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen, Sudan (former) or Tajikistan?
- Sudan (former), at 87,550 t against 74,566 t in Tajikistan as of 2011.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen between Sudan (former) and Tajikistan?
- 12,984 t, with Sudan (former) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sudan (former) and Tajikistan?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2011.
- How do Sudan (former) and Tajikistan rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen?
- Sudan (former) ranks 74th and Tajikistan ranks 77th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).