Suriname vs Uganda: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen over time
- Suriname
- Uganda
How they compare
Uganda currently reports 11,665 t against 10,300 t in Suriname, a difference of 1,365 t.
That makes Uganda's figure about 1.1 times Suriname's.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Uganda ahead.
Suriname ranks 126th and Uganda ranks 124th of 185 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Suriname averaged higher in 5 and Uganda in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Suriname | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1,143 t | 1,761 t | 618.11 t | Uganda |
| 1970s | 3,141 t | 2,114 t | 1,027 t | Suriname |
| 1980s | 5,709 t | 410.8 t | 5,299 t | Suriname |
| 1990s | 3,909 t | 839.4 t | 3,070 t | Suriname |
| 2000s | 6,510 t | 4,775 t | 1,735 t | Suriname |
| 2010s | 8,131 t | 7,964 t | 166.75 t | Suriname |
| 2020s | 8,187 t | 9,139 t | 952.25 t | Uganda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen, Suriname or Uganda?
- Uganda, at 11,665 t against 10,300 t in Suriname as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen between Suriname and Uganda?
- 1,365 t, with Uganda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Suriname and Uganda?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Suriname and Uganda rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland nitrogen?
- Suriname ranks 126th and Uganda ranks 124th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland nitrogen. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).