Armenia vs Cuba: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Armenia
- Cuba
How they compare
Armenia currently reports 0.5322 kg/ha against 0.4529 kg/ha in Cuba, a difference of 0.0793 kg/ha.
That makes Armenia's figure about 1.2 times Cuba's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Armenia ahead.
Armenia ranks 159th and Cuba ranks 162nd of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Armenia averaged higher in 2 and Cuba in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Cuba | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2.87 kg/ha | 2.62 kg/ha | 0.2526 kg/ha | Armenia |
| 2000s | 0.2451 kg/ha | 1.77 kg/ha | 1.52 kg/ha | Cuba |
| 2010s | 0.4563 kg/ha | 2.26 kg/ha | 1.8 kg/ha | Cuba |
| 2020s | 0.6819 kg/ha | 0.5076 kg/ha | 0.1743 kg/ha | Armenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Armenia or Cuba?
- Armenia, at 0.5322 kg/ha against 0.4529 kg/ha in Cuba as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Armenia and Cuba?
- 0.0793 kg/ha, with Armenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Cuba?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Armenia and Cuba rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Armenia ranks 159th and Cuba ranks 162nd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).