Caribbean vs Slovenia: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Caribbean
- Slovenia
How they compare
Slovenia currently reports 15.12 kg/ha against 1.15 kg/ha in Caribbean, a difference of 13.97 kg/ha.
That makes Slovenia's figure about 13.1 times Caribbean's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Slovenia has been ahead every year.
Caribbean ranks 27th and Slovenia ranks 26th of 29 countries.
Slovenia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Caribbean | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3.62 kg/ha | 24.53 kg/ha | 20.91 kg/ha | Slovenia |
| 2000s | 2.47 kg/ha | 20.9 kg/ha | 18.43 kg/ha | Slovenia |
| 2010s | 3.97 kg/ha | 11.54 kg/ha | 7.58 kg/ha | Slovenia |
| 2020s | 1.61 kg/ha | 12.14 kg/ha | 10.54 kg/ha | Slovenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Caribbean or Slovenia?
- Slovenia, at 15.12 kg/ha against 1.15 kg/ha in Caribbean as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Caribbean and Slovenia?
- 13.97 kg/ha, with Slovenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Caribbean and Slovenia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Caribbean and Slovenia rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Caribbean ranks 27th and Slovenia ranks 26th of 29 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).