Chile vs Serbia: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Chile
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 16.73 kg/ha against 15.67 kg/ha in Chile, a difference of 1.06 kg/ha.
That makes Serbia's figure about 1.1 times Chile's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 24th and Serbia ranks 21st of 186 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 22.25 kg/ha | 8.42 kg/ha | 13.83 kg/ha | Chile |
| 2010s | 20.48 kg/ha | 10.58 kg/ha | 9.9 kg/ha | Chile |
| 2020s | 17.32 kg/ha | 13.93 kg/ha | 3.39 kg/ha | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Chile or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 16.73 kg/ha against 15.67 kg/ha in Chile as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Chile and Serbia?
- 1.06 kg/ha, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Serbia?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Chile and Serbia rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Chile ranks 24th and Serbia ranks 21st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).