Colombia vs Uzbekistan: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Colombia
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Uzbekistan currently reports 17.55 kg/ha against 16.09 kg/ha in Colombia, a difference of 1.46 kg/ha.
That makes Uzbekistan's figure about 1.1 times Colombia's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Uzbekistan ahead.
Colombia ranks 22nd and Uzbekistan ranks 19th of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Colombia averaged higher in 3 and Uzbekistan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Colombia | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 10.9 kg/ha | 14.78 kg/ha | 3.88 kg/ha | Uzbekistan |
| 2000s | 18.16 kg/ha | 12.07 kg/ha | 6.09 kg/ha | Colombia |
| 2010s | 23.95 kg/ha | 14.43 kg/ha | 9.52 kg/ha | Colombia |
| 2020s | 17.31 kg/ha | 14.07 kg/ha | 3.25 kg/ha | Colombia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Colombia or Uzbekistan?
- Uzbekistan, at 17.55 kg/ha against 16.09 kg/ha in Colombia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Colombia and Uzbekistan?
- 1.46 kg/ha, with Uzbekistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Uzbekistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Colombia and Uzbekistan rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Colombia ranks 22nd and Uzbekistan ranks 19th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).