Cuba vs Kazakhstan: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Cuba
- Kazakhstan
How they compare
Kazakhstan currently reports 0.4923 kg/ha against 0.4529 kg/ha in Cuba, a difference of 0.0394 kg/ha.
That makes Kazakhstan's figure about 1.1 times Cuba's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kazakhstan ahead.
Cuba ranks 162nd and Kazakhstan ranks 161st of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 3 and Kazakhstan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Kazakhstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2.62 kg/ha | 1.12 kg/ha | 1.5 kg/ha | Cuba |
| 2000s | 1.77 kg/ha | 0.1679 kg/ha | 1.6 kg/ha | Cuba |
| 2010s | 2.26 kg/ha | 0.3795 kg/ha | 1.88 kg/ha | Cuba |
| 2020s | 0.5076 kg/ha | 0.5852 kg/ha | 0.0777 kg/ha | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Cuba or Kazakhstan?
- Kazakhstan, at 0.4923 kg/ha against 0.4529 kg/ha in Cuba as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Cuba and Kazakhstan?
- 0.0394 kg/ha, with Kazakhstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Kazakhstan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Cuba and Kazakhstan rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Cuba ranks 162nd and Kazakhstan ranks 161st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).