Cuba vs Sudan: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Cuba
- Sudan
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 0.4529 kg/ha against 0.3305 kg/ha in Sudan, a difference of 0.1224 kg/ha.
That makes Cuba's figure about 1.4 times Sudan's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Cuba ahead.
Cuba ranks 162nd and Sudan ranks 165th of 185 countries.
Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 2.29 kg/ha | 0.4438 kg/ha | 1.85 kg/ha | Cuba |
| 2020s | 0.5076 kg/ha | 0.4222 kg/ha | 0.0854 kg/ha | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Cuba or Sudan?
- Cuba, at 0.4529 kg/ha against 0.3305 kg/ha in Sudan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Cuba and Sudan?
- 0.1224 kg/ha, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Cuba and Sudan rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Cuba ranks 162nd and Sudan ranks 165th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).