Eswatini vs Latvia: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Eswatini
- Latvia
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 9.13 kg/ha against 8.9 kg/ha in Latvia, a difference of 0.23 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Latvia ahead.
Eswatini ranks 44th and Latvia ranks 46th of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 2 and Latvia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 4.83 kg/ha | 3.62 kg/ha | 1.22 kg/ha | Eswatini |
| 2000s | 5.26 kg/ha | 5.12 kg/ha | 0.1472 kg/ha | Eswatini |
| 2010s | 7.11 kg/ha | 8.64 kg/ha | 1.53 kg/ha | Latvia |
| 2020s | 9.08 kg/ha | 9.59 kg/ha | 0.5069 kg/ha | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Eswatini or Latvia?
- Eswatini, at 9.13 kg/ha against 8.9 kg/ha in Latvia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Eswatini and Latvia?
- 0.23 kg/ha, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Latvia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Eswatini and Latvia rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Eswatini ranks 44th and Latvia ranks 46th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).