Ethiopia PDR vs Peru: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Ethiopia PDR
- Peru
How they compare
Ethiopia PDR currently reports 5.13 kg/ha against 5.06 kg/ha in Peru, a difference of 0.07 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Peru ahead.
Ethiopia PDR ranks 101st and Peru ranks 102nd of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Ethiopia PDR averaged higher in 1 and Peru in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia PDR | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.1275 kg/ha | 3.53 kg/ha | 3.4 kg/ha | Peru |
| 1970s | 0.9406 kg/ha | 1.71 kg/ha | 0.7733 kg/ha | Peru |
| 1980s | 2.38 kg/ha | 2.43 kg/ha | 0.0409 kg/ha | Peru |
| 1990s | 3.9 kg/ha | 1.05 kg/ha | 2.85 kg/ha | Ethiopia PDR |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Ethiopia PDR or Peru?
- Ethiopia PDR, at 5.13 kg/ha against 5.06 kg/ha in Peru as of 1992.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Ethiopia PDR and Peru?
- 0.07 kg/ha, with Ethiopia PDR ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia PDR and Peru?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
- How do Ethiopia PDR and Peru rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Ethiopia PDR ranks 101st and Peru ranks 102nd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).