Ethiopia PDR vs Sweden: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Ethiopia PDR
- Sweden
How they compare
Sweden currently reports 5.31 kg/ha against 5.13 kg/ha in Ethiopia PDR, a difference of 0.18 kg/ha.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Sweden has been ahead every year.
Ethiopia PDR ranks 101st and Sweden ranks 98th of 186 countries.
Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia PDR | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.1275 kg/ha | 16.42 kg/ha | 16.29 kg/ha | Sweden |
| 1970s | 0.9406 kg/ha | 20.75 kg/ha | 19.81 kg/ha | Sweden |
| 1980s | 2.38 kg/ha | 14.12 kg/ha | 11.73 kg/ha | Sweden |
| 1990s | 3.9 kg/ha | 7.78 kg/ha | 3.88 kg/ha | Sweden |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Ethiopia PDR or Sweden?
- Sweden, at 5.31 kg/ha against 5.13 kg/ha in Ethiopia PDR as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Ethiopia PDR and Sweden?
- 0.18 kg/ha, with Sweden ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia PDR and Sweden?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1992.
- How do Ethiopia PDR and Sweden rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Ethiopia PDR ranks 101st and Sweden ranks 98th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).