Kazakhstan vs Nigeria: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Kazakhstan
- Nigeria
How they compare
Nigeria currently reports 0.5115 kg/ha against 0.4923 kg/ha in Kazakhstan, a difference of 0.0192 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kazakhstan ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 161st and Nigeria ranks 160th of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Kazakhstan averaged higher in 1 and Nigeria in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | Nigeria | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.12 kg/ha | 0.7112 kg/ha | 0.4091 kg/ha | Kazakhstan |
| 2000s | 0.1679 kg/ha | 0.4338 kg/ha | 0.2659 kg/ha | Nigeria |
| 2010s | 0.3795 kg/ha | 0.7837 kg/ha | 0.4042 kg/ha | Nigeria |
| 2020s | 0.5852 kg/ha | 0.8167 kg/ha | 0.2315 kg/ha | Nigeria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Kazakhstan or Nigeria?
- Nigeria, at 0.5115 kg/ha against 0.4923 kg/ha in Kazakhstan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Kazakhstan and Nigeria?
- 0.0192 kg/ha, with Nigeria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and Nigeria?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Kazakhstan and Nigeria rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Kazakhstan ranks 161st and Nigeria ranks 160th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).