Lithuania vs Philippines: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Lithuania
- Philippines
How they compare
Philippines currently reports 6.49 kg/ha against 6.29 kg/ha in Lithuania, a difference of 0.2 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Philippines ahead.
Lithuania ranks 84th and Philippines ranks 81st of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Lithuania averaged higher in 2 and Philippines in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Philippines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2.19 kg/ha | 5.35 kg/ha | 3.16 kg/ha | Philippines |
| 2000s | 5.51 kg/ha | 5.48 kg/ha | 0.0239 kg/ha | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 7.01 kg/ha | 5.59 kg/ha | 1.42 kg/ha | Lithuania |
| 2020s | 6.92 kg/ha | 9.47 kg/ha | 2.55 kg/ha | Philippines |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Lithuania or Philippines?
- Philippines, at 6.49 kg/ha against 6.29 kg/ha in Lithuania as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Lithuania and Philippines?
- 0.2 kg/ha, with Philippines ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Philippines?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Lithuania and Philippines rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Lithuania ranks 84th and Philippines ranks 81st of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).