Lithuania vs Puerto Rico: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Lithuania
- Puerto Rico
How they compare
Puerto Rico currently reports 6.36 kg/ha against 6.29 kg/ha in Lithuania, a difference of 0.07 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Puerto Rico ahead.
Lithuania ranks 82nd and Puerto Rico ranks 80th of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Lithuania averaged higher in 2 and Puerto Rico in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Puerto Rico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2.19 kg/ha | 3.23 kg/ha | 1.03 kg/ha | Puerto Rico |
| 2000s | 5.51 kg/ha | 2.13 kg/ha | 3.38 kg/ha | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 7.01 kg/ha | 9.72 kg/ha | 2.7 kg/ha | Puerto Rico |
| 2020s | 6.92 kg/ha | 6.74 kg/ha | 0.1826 kg/ha | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Lithuania or Puerto Rico?
- Puerto Rico, at 6.36 kg/ha against 6.29 kg/ha in Lithuania as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Lithuania and Puerto Rico?
- 0.07 kg/ha, with Puerto Rico ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Puerto Rico?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Lithuania and Puerto Rico rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Lithuania ranks 82nd and Puerto Rico ranks 80th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).