Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Qatar: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus per unit area

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
3.94 kg/ha
in 2023
Qatar
16.05 kg/ha
in 2023
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) rank
21st
Qatar rank
23rd

Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time

  • Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
  • Qatar
0102030196119922023

How they compare

Qatar currently reports 16.05 kg/ha against 3.94 kg/ha in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs), a difference of 12.11 kg/ha.

That makes Qatar's figure about 4.1 times Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)'s.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Qatar ahead.

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 21st and Qatar ranks 23rd of 29 groups.

Across the 7 decades both report, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) averaged higher in 2 and Qatar in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) Qatar Difference Ahead
1960s 1.02 kg/ha 26.16 kg/ha 25.14 kg/ha Qatar
1970s 2.28 kg/ha 17.88 kg/ha 15.6 kg/ha Qatar
1980s 3.63 kg/ha 3.76 kg/ha 0.1265 kg/ha Qatar
1990s 2.5 kg/ha 2.17 kg/ha 0.3263 kg/ha Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2000s 2.01 kg/ha 0.6446 kg/ha 1.36 kg/ha Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs)
2010s 2.81 kg/ha 9.26 kg/ha 6.45 kg/ha Qatar
2020s 3.82 kg/ha 19.27 kg/ha 15.44 kg/ha Qatar

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) or Qatar?
Qatar, at 16.05 kg/ha against 3.94 kg/ha in Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) as of 2023.
What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Qatar?
12.11 kg/ha, with Qatar ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Qatar?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) and Qatar rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) ranks 21st and Qatar ranks 23rd of 29 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Qatar: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mineral-fertilizers-cropland-phosphorus-per-unit-area/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/qatar/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://environment.statizoid.com/compare/mineral-fertilizers-cropland-phosphorus-per-unit-area/low-income-food-deficit-countries-lifdcs/qatar/">Low Income Food Deficit Countries (LIFDCs) vs Qatar: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus per unit area</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Unit
kg/ha
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
233 places, 13,497 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).