Luxembourg vs Sri Lanka: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Luxembourg
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Luxembourg currently reports 2.7 kg/ha against 2.7 kg/ha in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Luxembourg ahead.
Luxembourg ranks 126th and Sri Lanka ranks 127th of 186 countries.
Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Luxembourg | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 8.2 kg/ha | 8.83 kg/ha | 0.6335 kg/ha | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | 5.26 kg/ha | 9.34 kg/ha | 4.08 kg/ha | Sri Lanka |
| 2020s | 3.35 kg/ha | 4.77 kg/ha | 1.42 kg/ha | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Luxembourg or Sri Lanka?
- Luxembourg, at 2.7 kg/ha against 2.7 kg/ha in Sri Lanka as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Luxembourg and Sri Lanka?
- 0 kg/ha, with Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Sri Lanka?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Luxembourg and Sri Lanka rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Luxembourg ranks 126th and Sri Lanka ranks 127th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).