Montenegro vs Paraguay: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Montenegro
- Paraguay
How they compare
Montenegro currently reports 14.44 kg/ha against 14.17 kg/ha in Paraguay, a difference of 0.27 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Montenegro ahead.
Montenegro ranks 28th and Paraguay ranks 29th of 186 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Montenegro averaged higher in 2 and Paraguay in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Montenegro | Paraguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 20.62 kg/ha | 14.52 kg/ha | 6.09 kg/ha | Montenegro |
| 2010s | 16.89 kg/ha | 17.33 kg/ha | 0.4386 kg/ha | Paraguay |
| 2020s | 16.69 kg/ha | 15.18 kg/ha | 1.51 kg/ha | Montenegro |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Montenegro or Paraguay?
- Montenegro, at 14.44 kg/ha against 14.17 kg/ha in Paraguay as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Montenegro and Paraguay?
- 0.27 kg/ha, with Montenegro ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Montenegro and Paraguay?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
- How do Montenegro and Paraguay rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Montenegro ranks 28th and Paraguay ranks 29th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).