North Macedonia vs Sudan (former): Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- North Macedonia
- Sudan (former)
How they compare
Sudan (former) currently reports 3.45 kg/ha against 3.29 kg/ha in North Macedonia, a difference of 0.16 kg/ha.
Across all 20 years both countries report, North Macedonia has been ahead every year.
North Macedonia ranks 121st and Sudan (former) ranks 119th of 186 countries.
North Macedonia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | North Macedonia | Sudan (former) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 5.56 kg/ha | 0.9107 kg/ha | 4.64 kg/ha | North Macedonia |
| 2000s | 6.55 kg/ha | 0.699 kg/ha | 5.85 kg/ha | North Macedonia |
| 2010s | 5.34 kg/ha | 3.45 kg/ha | 1.88 kg/ha | North Macedonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus per unit area, North Macedonia or Sudan (former)?
- Sudan (former), at 3.45 kg/ha against 3.29 kg/ha in North Macedonia as of 2011.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus per unit area between North Macedonia and Sudan (former)?
- 0.16 kg/ha, with Sudan (former) ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for North Macedonia and Sudan (former)?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2011.
- How do North Macedonia and Sudan (former) rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- North Macedonia ranks 121st and Sudan (former) ranks 119th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).