Poland vs Turkmenistan: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Poland
- Turkmenistan
How they compare
Turkmenistan currently reports 8.44 kg/ha against 8.32 kg/ha in Poland, a difference of 0.12 kg/ha.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Turkmenistan ahead.
Poland ranks 52nd and Turkmenistan ranks 50th of 186 countries.
Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Poland | Turkmenistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 7.64 kg/ha | 7.1 kg/ha | 0.5407 kg/ha | Poland |
| 2000s | 11.09 kg/ha | 0.8137 kg/ha | 10.27 kg/ha | Poland |
| 2010s | 12.2 kg/ha | 4.09 kg/ha | 8.11 kg/ha | Poland |
| 2020s | 10 kg/ha | 7.86 kg/ha | 2.14 kg/ha | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Poland or Turkmenistan?
- Turkmenistan, at 8.44 kg/ha against 8.32 kg/ha in Poland as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Poland and Turkmenistan?
- 0.12 kg/ha, with Turkmenistan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Poland and Turkmenistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Poland and Turkmenistan rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Poland ranks 52nd and Turkmenistan ranks 50th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).