Uruguay vs Uzbekistan: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus per unit area
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus per unit area over time
- Uruguay
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports 20.58 kg/ha against 17.55 kg/ha in Uzbekistan, a difference of 3.03 kg/ha.
That makes Uruguay's figure about 1.2 times Uzbekistan's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Uzbekistan ahead.
Uruguay ranks 16th and Uzbekistan ranks 19th of 186 countries.
Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Uruguay | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 17.08 kg/ha | 14.78 kg/ha | 2.3 kg/ha | Uruguay |
| 2000s | 21.4 kg/ha | 12.07 kg/ha | 9.33 kg/ha | Uruguay |
| 2010s | 23.9 kg/ha | 14.43 kg/ha | 9.47 kg/ha | Uruguay |
| 2020s | 24.9 kg/ha | 14.07 kg/ha | 10.83 kg/ha | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus per unit area, Uruguay or Uzbekistan?
- Uruguay, at 20.58 kg/ha against 17.55 kg/ha in Uzbekistan as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus per unit area between Uruguay and Uzbekistan?
- 3.03 kg/ha, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Uruguay and Uzbekistan?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Uruguay and Uzbekistan rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus per unit area?
- Uruguay ranks 16th and Uzbekistan ranks 19th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus per unit area. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).