Argentina vs Republic of Moldova: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Argentina
- Republic of Moldova
How they compare
Argentina currently reports 285,201 t against 7,468 t in Republic of Moldova, a difference of 277,733 t.
That makes Argentina's figure about 38.2 times Republic of Moldova's.
Across all 32 years both countries report, Argentina has been ahead every year.
Argentina ranks 11th and Republic of Moldova ranks 12th of 186 countries.
Argentina has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Republic of Moldova | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 88,128 t | 11,271 t | 76,858 t | Argentina |
| 2000s | 177,609 t | 322.18 t | 177,287 t | Argentina |
| 2010s | 249,777 t | 6,360 t | 243,416 t | Argentina |
| 2020s | 323,559 t | 7,887 t | 315,672 t | Argentina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus, Argentina or Republic of Moldova?
- Argentina, at 285,201 t against 7,468 t in Republic of Moldova as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus between Argentina and Republic of Moldova?
- 277,733 t, with Argentina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Republic of Moldova?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Argentina and Republic of Moldova rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus?
- Argentina ranks 11th and Republic of Moldova ranks 12th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).