Armenia vs Sierra Leone: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Armenia
- Sierra Leone
How they compare
Sierra Leone currently reports 380.19 t against 267.92 t in Armenia, a difference of 112.27 t.
That makes Sierra Leone's figure about 1.4 times Armenia's.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Armenia ahead.
Armenia ranks 144th and Sierra Leone ranks 141st of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Armenia averaged higher in 2 and Sierra Leone in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Sierra Leone | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1,418 t | 301.38 t | 1,117 t | Armenia |
| 2000s | 121.69 t | 99.5 t | 22.2 t | Armenia |
| 2010s | 230.23 t | 280 t | 49.77 t | Sierra Leone |
| 2020s | 343.51 t | 380.19 t | 36.68 t | Sierra Leone |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus, Armenia or Sierra Leone?
- Sierra Leone, at 380.19 t against 267.92 t in Armenia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus between Armenia and Sierra Leone?
- 112.27 t, with Sierra Leone ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Sierra Leone?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Armenia and Sierra Leone rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus?
- Armenia ranks 144th and Sierra Leone ranks 141st of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).