Austria vs Finland: Mineral fertilizers β Cropland phosphorus
Mineral fertilizers β Cropland phosphorus over time
- Austria
- Finland
How they compare
Austria currently reports 10,015 t against 9,179 t in Finland, a difference of 836 t.
That makes Austria's figure about 1.1 times Finland's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Finland ahead.
Austria ranks 78th and Finland ranks 80th of 185 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Austria averaged higher in 2 and Finland in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Austria | Finland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 49,276 t | 58,468 t | 9,193 t | Finland |
| 1970s | 41,330 t | 74,151 t | 32,821 t | Finland |
| 1980s | 32,743 t | 66,057 t | 33,315 t | Finland |
| 1990s | 23,682 t | 32,044 t | 8,362 t | Finland |
| 2000s | 14,976 t | 18,465 t | 3,489 t | Finland |
| 2010s | 12,774 t | 10,670 t | 2,103 t | Austria |
| 2020s | 10,087 t | 9,946 t | 141.05 t | Austria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers β cropland phosphorus, Austria or Finland?
- Austria, at 10,015 t against 9,179 t in Finland as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers β cropland phosphorus between Austria and Finland?
- 836 t, with Austria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and Finland?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Austria and Finland rank globally for mineral fertilizers β cropland phosphorus?
- Austria ranks 78th and Finland ranks 80th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers β Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).