Barbados vs Grenada: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Barbados
- Grenada
How they compare
Barbados currently reports 22.24 t against 10.46 t in Grenada, a difference of 11.78 t.
That makes Barbados's figure about 2.1 times Grenada's.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Grenada ahead.
Barbados ranks 178th and Grenada ranks 181st of 201 countries.
Barbados has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Barbados | Grenada | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 101.68 t | 30.08 t | 71.6 t | Barbados |
| 1970s | 292.51 t | 30.08 t | 262.43 t | Barbados |
| 1980s | 378.97 t | 30.08 t | 348.89 t | Barbados |
| 1990s | 87.2 t | 30.08 t | 57.12 t | Barbados |
| 2000s | 120.38 t | 20.67 t | 99.71 t | Barbados |
| 2010s | 130.32 t | 30 t | 100.32 t | Barbados |
| 2020s | 46.43 t | 12.43 t | 34.01 t | Barbados |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus, Barbados or Grenada?
- Barbados, at 22.24 t against 10.46 t in Grenada as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus between Barbados and Grenada?
- 11.78 t, with Barbados ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Grenada?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Barbados and Grenada rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus?
- Barbados ranks 178th and Grenada ranks 181st of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).