Belarus vs Republic of Korea: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Belarus
- Republic of Korea
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 43,883 t against 33,124 t in Republic of Korea, a difference of 10,759 t.
That makes Belarus's figure about 1.3 times Republic of Korea's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 43rd and Republic of Korea ranks 46th of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 2 and Republic of Korea in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Republic of Korea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 45,518 t | 92,274 t | 46,756 t | Republic of Korea |
| 2000s | 50,437 t | 60,634 t | 10,197 t | Republic of Korea |
| 2010s | 62,228 t | 50,273 t | 11,955 t | Belarus |
| 2020s | 40,506 t | 35,172 t | 5,335 t | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus, Belarus or Republic of Korea?
- Belarus, at 43,883 t against 33,124 t in Republic of Korea as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus between Belarus and Republic of Korea?
- 10,759 t, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Republic of Korea?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Belarus and Republic of Korea rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus?
- Belarus ranks 43rd and Republic of Korea ranks 46th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).