Belarus vs Uruguay: Mineral fertilizers β Cropland phosphorus
Mineral fertilizers β Cropland phosphorus over time
- Belarus
- Uruguay
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports 46,073 t against 43,883 t in Belarus, a difference of 2,190 t.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 45th and Uruguay ranks 42nd of 201 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 3 and Uruguay in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 45,518 t | 23,244 t | 22,274 t | Belarus |
| 2000s | 50,437 t | 32,942 t | 17,495 t | Belarus |
| 2010s | 62,228 t | 54,413 t | 7,815 t | Belarus |
| 2020s | 40,506 t | 52,743 t | 12,237 t | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers β cropland phosphorus, Belarus or Uruguay?
- Uruguay, at 46,073 t against 43,883 t in Belarus as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers β cropland phosphorus between Belarus and Uruguay?
- 2,190 t, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Uruguay?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Belarus and Uruguay rank globally for mineral fertilizers β cropland phosphorus?
- Belarus ranks 45th and Uruguay ranks 42nd of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers β Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).