Belgium-Luxembourg vs Kenya: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Belgium-Luxembourg
- Kenya
How they compare
Kenya currently reports 48,512 t against 45,000 t in Belgium-Luxembourg, a difference of 3,512 t.
That makes Kenya's figure about 1.1 times Belgium-Luxembourg's.
Across all 39 years both countries report, Belgium-Luxembourg has been ahead every year.
Belgium-Luxembourg ranks 41st and Kenya ranks 38th of 186 countries.
Belgium-Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium-Luxembourg | Kenya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 135,909 t | 5,693 t | 130,216 t | Belgium-Luxembourg |
| 1970s | 136,555 t | 10,230 t | 126,325 t | Belgium-Luxembourg |
| 1980s | 92,130 t | 18,103 t | 74,027 t | Belgium-Luxembourg |
| 1990s | 53,300 t | 26,156 t | 27,144 t | Belgium-Luxembourg |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus, Belgium-Luxembourg or Kenya?
- Kenya, at 48,512 t against 45,000 t in Belgium-Luxembourg as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus between Belgium-Luxembourg and Kenya?
- 3,512 t, with Kenya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium-Luxembourg and Kenya?
- 39 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 1999.
- How do Belgium-Luxembourg and Kenya rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus?
- Belgium-Luxembourg ranks 41st and Kenya ranks 38th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).