Belgium vs Panama: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Belgium
- Panama
How they compare
Panama currently reports 4,641 t against 4,351 t in Belgium, a difference of 290 t.
That makes Panama's figure about 1.1 times Belgium's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Belgium ahead.
Belgium ranks 95th and Panama ranks 94th of 185 countries.
Belgium has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Panama | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 14,495 t | 1,546 t | 12,949 t | Belgium |
| 2010s | 7,033 t | 4,448 t | 2,585 t | Belgium |
| 2020s | 4,917 t | 4,617 t | 300.46 t | Belgium |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus, Belgium or Panama?
- Panama, at 4,641 t against 4,351 t in Belgium as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus between Belgium and Panama?
- 290 t, with Panama ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Panama?
- 24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
- How do Belgium and Panama rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus?
- Belgium ranks 95th and Panama ranks 94th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).