Burkina Faso vs Czechia: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Burkina Faso
- Czechia
How they compare
Burkina Faso currently reports 15,920 t against 15,442 t in Czechia, a difference of 478 t.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Czechia ahead.
Burkina Faso ranks 63rd and Czechia ranks 64th of 186 countries.
Czechia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burkina Faso | Czechia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 4,553 t | 21,485 t | 16,932 t | Czechia |
| 2000s | 5,371 t | 19,559 t | 14,188 t | Czechia |
| 2010s | 8,670 t | 20,061 t | 11,392 t | Czechia |
| 2020s | 12,124 t | 16,152 t | 4,028 t | Czechia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus, Burkina Faso or Czechia?
- Burkina Faso, at 15,920 t against 15,442 t in Czechia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus between Burkina Faso and Czechia?
- 478 t, with Burkina Faso ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Czechia?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Burkina Faso and Czechia rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus?
- Burkina Faso ranks 63rd and Czechia ranks 64th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).