Burkina Faso vs Honduras: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Burkina Faso
- Honduras
How they compare
Honduras currently reports 16,029 t against 15,920 t in Burkina Faso, a difference of 109 t.
The two have swapped places 14 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Honduras ahead.
Burkina Faso ranks 63rd and Honduras ranks 62nd of 186 countries.
Honduras has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burkina Faso | Honduras | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 47.23 t | 463.08 t | 415.85 t | Honduras |
| 1970s | 643.14 t | 1,657 t | 1,014 t | Honduras |
| 1980s | 2,096 t | 2,152 t | 56.11 t | Honduras |
| 1990s | 4,161 t | 6,654 t | 2,492 t | Honduras |
| 2000s | 5,371 t | 6,247 t | 876.67 t | Honduras |
| 2010s | 8,670 t | 13,212 t | 4,542 t | Honduras |
| 2020s | 12,124 t | 15,274 t | 3,150 t | Honduras |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus, Burkina Faso or Honduras?
- Honduras, at 16,029 t against 15,920 t in Burkina Faso as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus between Burkina Faso and Honduras?
- 109 t, with Honduras ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Honduras?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Burkina Faso and Honduras rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus?
- Burkina Faso ranks 63rd and Honduras ranks 62nd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).