Burundi vs Hungary: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Burundi
- Hungary
How they compare
Hungary currently reports 20,211 t against 17,829 t in Burundi, a difference of 2,382 t.
That makes Hungary's figure about 1.1 times Burundi's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Hungary has been ahead every year.
Burundi ranks 60th and Hungary ranks 57th of 186 countries.
Hungary has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burundi | Hungary | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 4.36 t | 55,227 t | 55,222 t | Hungary |
| 1970s | 79.96 t | 150,980 t | 150,900 t | Hungary |
| 1980s | 394.67 t | 160,609 t | 160,214 t | Hungary |
| 1990s | 754.39 t | 22,454 t | 21,700 t | Hungary |
| 2000s | 348.71 t | 26,621 t | 26,272 t | Hungary |
| 2010s | 2,464 t | 32,345 t | 29,880 t | Hungary |
| 2020s | 11,890 t | 32,971 t | 21,080 t | Hungary |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus, Burundi or Hungary?
- Hungary, at 20,211 t against 17,829 t in Burundi as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus between Burundi and Hungary?
- 2,382 t, with Hungary ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Hungary?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Burundi and Hungary rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus?
- Burundi ranks 60th and Hungary ranks 57th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).