Cabo Verde vs Tonga: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Cabo Verde
- Tonga
How they compare
Cabo Verde currently reports 7.85 t against 5.23 t in Tonga, a difference of 2.62 t.
That makes Cabo Verde's figure about 1.5 times Tonga's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cabo Verde ahead.
Cabo Verde ranks 182nd and Tonga ranks 185th of 201 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Cabo Verde averaged higher in 5 and Tonga in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cabo Verde | Tonga | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 7.41 t | 3.05 t | 4.36 t | Cabo Verde |
| 1970s | 7.54 t | 3.05 t | 4.49 t | Cabo Verde |
| 1980s | 8.75 t | 4.26 t | 4.5 t | Cabo Verde |
| 1990s | 7.19 t | 2.24 t | 4.96 t | Cabo Verde |
| 2000s | 8.9 t | 2.88 t | 6.02 t | Cabo Verde |
| 2010s | 9.98 t | 24.07 t | 14.08 t | Tonga |
| 2020s | 10.03 t | 19.07 t | 9.05 t | Tonga |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus, Cabo Verde or Tonga?
- Cabo Verde, at 7.85 t against 5.23 t in Tonga as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus between Cabo Verde and Tonga?
- 2.62 t, with Cabo Verde ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cabo Verde and Tonga?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Cabo Verde and Tonga rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus?
- Cabo Verde ranks 182nd and Tonga ranks 185th of 201 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).