Cambodia vs Nigeria: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Cambodia
- Nigeria
How they compare
Nigeria currently reports 22,620 t against 21,245 t in Cambodia, a difference of 1,375 t.
That makes Nigeria's figure about 1.1 times Cambodia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Cambodia ahead.
Cambodia ranks 56th and Nigeria ranks 54th of 185 countries.
Nigeria has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cambodia | Nigeria | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 376.32 t | 1,062 t | 685.22 t | Nigeria |
| 1970s | 337.38 t | 7,017 t | 6,679 t | Nigeria |
| 1980s | 1,018 t | 35,854 t | 34,836 t | Nigeria |
| 1990s | 1,533 t | 29,952 t | 28,419 t | Nigeria |
| 2000s | 8,895 t | 18,191 t | 9,296 t | Nigeria |
| 2010s | 12,775 t | 33,314 t | 20,539 t | Nigeria |
| 2020s | 22,207 t | 35,814 t | 13,608 t | Nigeria |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus, Cambodia or Nigeria?
- Nigeria, at 22,620 t against 21,245 t in Cambodia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus between Cambodia and Nigeria?
- 1,375 t, with Nigeria ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Nigeria?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Cambodia and Nigeria rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus?
- Cambodia ranks 56th and Nigeria ranks 54th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).