Cameroon vs Sri Lanka: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Cameroon
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 6,927 t against 5,475 t in Cameroon, a difference of 1,452 t.
That makes Sri Lanka's figure about 1.3 times Cameroon's.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Sri Lanka has been ahead every year.
Cameroon ranks 90th and Sri Lanka ranks 88th of 185 countries.
Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cameroon | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 359.34 t | 8,670 t | 8,311 t | Sri Lanka |
| 1970s | 1,477 t | 8,809 t | 7,332 t | Sri Lanka |
| 1980s | 3,548 t | 15,643 t | 12,095 t | Sri Lanka |
| 1990s | 2,400 t | 14,244 t | 11,844 t | Sri Lanka |
| 2000s | 3,920 t | 17,634 t | 13,714 t | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | 4,780 t | 21,475 t | 16,695 t | Sri Lanka |
| 2020s | 5,619 t | 11,444 t | 5,825 t | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus, Cameroon or Sri Lanka?
- Sri Lanka, at 6,927 t against 5,475 t in Cameroon as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus between Cameroon and Sri Lanka?
- 1,452 t, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cameroon and Sri Lanka?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Cameroon and Sri Lanka rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus?
- Cameroon ranks 90th and Sri Lanka ranks 88th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).