Central African Republic vs Eritrea: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Central African Republic
- Eritrea
How they compare
Central African Republic currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Eritrea, a difference of 0 t.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Eritrea ahead.
Central African Republic ranks 175th and Eritrea ranks 175th of 186 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Central African Republic averaged higher in 1 and Eritrea in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central African Republic | Eritrea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 56.06 t | 611.65 t | 555.59 t | Eritrea |
| 2000s | 38.32 t | 559.08 t | 520.76 t | Eritrea |
| 2010s | 34.05 t | 69.28 t | 35.23 t | Eritrea |
| 2020s | 6.32 t | 0 t | 6.32 t | Central African Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus, Central African Republic or Eritrea?
- Central African Republic, at 0 t against 0 t in Eritrea as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus between Central African Republic and Eritrea?
- 0 t, with Central African Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Eritrea?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
- How do Central African Republic and Eritrea rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus?
- Central African Republic ranks 175th and Eritrea ranks 175th of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).