Central African Republic vs South Sudan: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Central African Republic
- South Sudan
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 1.74 t against 0 t in Central African Republic, a difference of 1.74 t.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Central African Republic ahead.
Central African Republic ranks 175th and South Sudan ranks 173rd of 186 countries.
Central African Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central African Republic | South Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 17.6 t | 9.32 t | 8.28 t | Central African Republic |
| 2020s | 6.32 t | 4.91 t | 1.42 t | Central African Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus, Central African Republic or South Sudan?
- South Sudan, at 1.74 t against 0 t in Central African Republic as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus between Central African Republic and South Sudan?
- 1.74 t, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and South Sudan?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2023.
- How do Central African Republic and South Sudan rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus?
- Central African Republic ranks 175th and South Sudan ranks 173rd of 186 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).