Central Asia vs Ukraine: Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus
Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus over time
- Central Asia
- Ukraine
How they compare
Central Asia currently reports 111,078 t against 90,820 t in Ukraine, a difference of 20,258 t.
That makes Central Asia's figure about 1.2 times Ukraine's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Central Asia ahead.
Central Asia ranks 24th and Ukraine ranks 25th of 29 groups.
Across the 4 decades both report, Central Asia averaged higher in 2 and Ukraine in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central Asia | Ukraine | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 129,715 t | 76,464 t | 53,251 t | Central Asia |
| 2000s | 67,778 t | 41,657 t | 26,121 t | Central Asia |
| 2010s | 85,340 t | 124,913 t | 39,574 t | Ukraine |
| 2020s | 97,912 t | 139,086 t | 41,174 t | Ukraine |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus, Central Asia or Ukraine?
- Central Asia, at 111,078 t against 90,820 t in Ukraine as of 2023.
- What is the difference in mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus between Central Asia and Ukraine?
- 20,258 t, with Central Asia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central Asia and Ukraine?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2023.
- How do Central Asia and Ukraine rank globally for mineral fertilizers — cropland phosphorus?
- Central Asia ranks 24th and Ukraine ranks 25th of 29 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Mineral fertilizers — Cropland phosphorus. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Cropland Nutrient balance domain contains information on the flows of nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium from mineral fertilizer, manure applied, atmospheric deposition, crop removal, and biological fixation over cropland and per unit area of cropland. The flows are aggregated to total inputs and total outputs, from which the overall nutrient balance and nutrient use efficiency on cropland are calculated. Statistics are disseminated in units of tonnes and in kg/ha, as appropriate. Nutrient use efficiency is expressed as a fraction (%).